unable to branch libjpeg-turbo

[Olaf Hering]

Petr,

for some reason osc is unable to branch libjpeg-turbo properly. Its not
possible to do a 'osc sr' from the resulting
home:olh:branches:graphics/libjpeg62-turbo. Maybe with some extra effort
osc would do it anyway.

Please include the following patch manually in graphics/libjpeg-turbo.
The existing Provides/Conflicts can not work with current pkg version.


Thanks,

Olaf

Index: libjpeg-turbo.changes
===================================================================
--- libjpeg-turbo.changes (revision 2)
+++ libjpeg-turbo.changes (revision 3)
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Wed Oct 15 11:39:09 UTC 2014 - ***@aepfle.de
+
+- Obsolete jpeg version 6b, 8.0.1 and 8.0.2 to avoid conflicts
+ during zypper dup
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Mar 31 09:29:11 UTC 2014 - ***@suse.com

- update to 1.3.1:
Index: libjpeg-turbo.spec
===================================================================
--- libjpeg-turbo.spec (revision 2)
+++ libjpeg-turbo.spec (revision 3)
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
BuildRequires: gcc-c++
BuildRequires: libtool
BuildRequires: yasm
+Obsoletes: jpeg = 6b
+Obsoletes: jpeg = 8.0.1
+Obsoletes: jpeg = 8.0.2
Provides: jpeg = %{version}
Obsoletes: jpeg < %{version}
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build

[Andreas Schwab]

Post by Olaf Hering
for some reason osc is unable to branch libjpeg-turbo properly. Its not
possible to do a 'osc sr' from the resulting
home:olh:branches:graphics/libjpeg62-turbo.

This is just a link, you need to work on and sr from libjpeg-turbo.

Andreas.

[Olaf Hering]

Post by Andreas Schwab

Post by Olaf Hering
for some reason osc is unable to branch libjpeg-turbo properly. Its not
possible to do a 'osc sr' from the resulting
home:olh:branches:graphics/libjpeg62-turbo.

This is just a link, you need to work on and sr from libjpeg-turbo.

Likely. As I said, osc bco doesnt do the right thing for this package.

Olaf

[Andreas Schwab]

Post by Olaf Hering
Likely. As I said, osc bco doesnt do the right thing for this package.

In which way? Worksforme.

Andreas.

[Olaf Hering]

Post by Andreas Schwab

Post by Olaf Hering
Likely. As I said, osc bco doesnt do the right thing for this package.

In which way? Worksforme.

All it gives is a libjpeg62-turbo, osc up -u does not download the
libjpeg-turbo shown by osc pr.

Olaf

[Andreas Schwab]

Post by Olaf Hering
All it gives is a libjpeg62-turbo, osc up -u does not download the
libjpeg-turbo shown by osc pr.

$ osc bco openSUSE:Factory libjpeg-turbo

Note: The branch has been created of a different project,
graphics,
which is the primary location of where development for
that package takes place.
That's also where you would normally make changes against.
A direct branch of the specified package can be forced
with the --nodevelproject option.

A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/baselibs.conf
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-ocloexec.patch
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-int32.patch
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-tiff-ojpeg.patch
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.1.tar.gz
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.changes
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg62-turbo.changes
A home:Andreas_Schwab:branches:graphics/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg62-turbo.spec
At revision c99f22dea3507cb1fb24c996ca9ad083.
Note: You can use "osc delete" or "osc submitpac" when done.

Andreas.

[Adrian Schröter]

Post by Olaf Hering

Post by Andreas Schwab

Post by Olaf Hering
for some reason osc is unable to branch libjpeg-turbo properly. Its not
possible to do a 'osc sr' from the resulting
home:olh:branches:graphics/libjpeg62-turbo.

This is just a link, you need to work on and sr from libjpeg-turbo.

Likely. As I said, osc bco doesnt do the right thing for this package.

libjpeg62-turbo could define libjpeg-turbo as devel package. It would to then "the right thing"
--
Adrian Schroeter
email: ***@suse.de

SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5
90409 Nürnberg
Germany

[Olaf Hering]

Post by Adrian Schröter

Post by Olaf Hering

Post by Andreas Schwab

Post by Olaf Hering
for some reason osc is unable to branch libjpeg-turbo properly. Its not
possible to do a 'osc sr' from the resulting
home:olh:branches:graphics/libjpeg62-turbo.

This is just a link, you need to work on and sr from libjpeg-turbo.

Likely. As I said, osc bco doesnt do the right thing for this package.

libjpeg62-turbo could define libjpeg-turbo as devel package. It would to then "the right thing"

Would that also fix the 'osc up -u' issue?

Olaf

[Olaf Hering]

...

There is something broken with 'osc bco pkg'.
Why does it list baloo in in the description after a 'osc bco
kdebase4-workspace'? Why does it have the attribute OBS:Maintained? Is
that a new feature? Is my osc too old or too new? I just checked, there
is nothing new in "openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Tools".

https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:olh:branches:KDE:Distro:Factory

Olaf

[Andreas Schwab]

Post by Olaf Hering
Why does it list baloo in in the description after a 'osc bco
kdebase4-workspace'? Why does it have the attribute OBS:Maintained?

Becasue you crated home:olh:branches:KDE:Distro:Factory on 2014-10-02
13:32:07 after you branched baloo.

Andreas.

[Olaf Hering]

Post by Andreas Schwab

Post by Olaf Hering
Why does it list baloo in in the description after a 'osc bco
kdebase4-workspace'? Why does it have the attribute OBS:Maintained?

Becasue you crated home:olh:branches:KDE:Distro:Factory on 2014-10-02
13:32:07 after you branched baloo.

I probably did that. But why does it have OBS:Maintained?
My libjpeg-turbo is already deleted, I think it had that flag as well.
And libjpeg62 or whatever was the main package even though I requested
something else with bco.

Olaf